Math Blog

The Arrival of New Era of “Knowledge Sharing”

tomcircle's avatarMath Online Tom Circle

2010 Steve Jobs declared Post-PC era has arrived with iPhone/iPad,  little did he know that he had accidentally also brought the Post-TV & Post-Publication (books, Newspapers) on iPhone/iPad platform for YouTube, ebooks.
Today,  you don’t have to sit on sofa at scheduled time to watch TV programmes,  buy/loan/housekeep books, subscribe to political-biased  newspapers.

The advent of Web 2.0 and Internet of Things (IoT) will open up the new era of freedom of “Knowledge Sharing”:
1. Instead of reading 100 books to understand a complex economic/politics/history/science topic, you can go YouTube to attend free seminars by TED, MOOC (Cousera, Khan Academy…), or follow YouTube series by book expert reviewers (罗辑思维, 袁腾飞, 百家论坛, 宋鸿兵货币战争)…
2. You can ask any questions on “Quora”. Anybody with the expertise will volunteer to teach you.
3. You can keep your reading notes in text, video and hyperlink to the vast internet resources (wikipedia, ..) and shared…

View original post 9 more words

A solvable group that has a composition series is necessarily finite

Facebook Profile Picture 03

Do try out this Free Career Guidance Personality Test at https://career-test.com/s/sgamb?reid=210 while it is still available!

Benefits of doing the (Free) Career Test:

  • Get familiar with the top companies in Singapore
  • There are seven distinct career types based on career preferences, goals and personality. Get to know yours! (My result: Harmonizer)
  • Take part in the annual Universum survey and win prizes!

Let G be a solvable group. We prove that if G has a composition series, then G has to be finite. (Note that this is sort of a converse to “A finite group has a composition series.”)

Let G=G_0\geq G_1\geq \dots\geq G_n=1 be a composition series of G, where each factor G_i/G_{i+1} is simple.

Since G_i and G_{i+1} are solvable (every subgroup of a solvable group is solvable), the quotient G_i/G_{i+1} is also solvable.

We can prove that G_i/G_{i+1} is abelian. Since (G_i/G_{i+1})'\trianglelefteq G_i/G_{i+1}, by the fact that the factor is simple, we have (G_i/G_{i+1})'=1 or G_i/G_{i+1}.

If (G_i/G_{i+1})'=G_i/G_{i+1}, then this contradicts the fact that G_i/G_{i+1} is solvable. Thus (G_i/G_{i+1})'=1 and G_i/G_{i+1} is abelian.

Key step: G_i/G_{i+1} is simple and abelian, G_i/G_{i+1}\cong\mathbb{Z}_{p_i} for some prime p_i.

Since |G_{n-1}|=p_{n-1}, so we have that |G_{n-2}|=|G_{n-2}/G_{n-1}||G_{n-1}|=p_{n-2}p_{n-1}. By induction, |G_i|=p_i p_{i+1}\dots p_{n-1}.

|G|=|G_0|=p_0p_1\dots p_{n-1}. Thus G is finite.

 

Conjugacy Classes of non-abelian group of order p^3

Do try out this Free Career Guidance Personality Test at https://career-test.com/s/sgamb?reid=210 while it is still available!

Benefits of doing the (Free) Career Test:

  • Get familiar with the top companies in Singapore
  • There are seven distinct career types based on career preferences, goals and personality. Get to know yours! (My result: Harmonizer)
  • Take part in the annual Universum survey and win prizes!

Let p be a prime, and let G be a non-abelian group of order p^3. We want to find the number of conjugacy classes of G.

First we prove a lemma: Z(G) has order p.

Proof: We know that since G is a non-trivial p-group, then Z(G)\neq 1. Since Z(G)\trianglelefteq G, by Lagrange’s Theorem, |Z(G)|=p,p^2,\text{or }p^3.

Case 1) |Z(G)|=p. We are done.

Case 2) |Z(G)|=p^2. Then |G/Z(G)|=p^3/p=p. Thus G/Z(G) is cyclic which implies that G is abelian. (contradiction).

Case 3) |Z(G)|=p^3. This means that the entire group G is abelian. (contradiction).

Next, let O(x_1),\dots, O(x_n) be the distinct conjugacy classes of G.

O(x_i)=\{gx_i g^{-1}:g\in G\}, where C_G(x_i)=\{g\in G:gx_i=x_ig\}.

Then by the Class Equation, we have \displaystyle p^3=|G|=\sum_{i=1}^n [G:C_G(x_i)].

If x_i\in Z(G), then C_G(x_i)=G, which means [G:C_G(x_i)]=1.

If x_i \notin Z(G), then C_G(x_i)\neq G. Since x_i\in C_G(x_i), thus Z(G)\subsetneq C_G(x_i). Thus we have p=|Z(G)|<|C_G(x_i)|<|G|=p^3. Since C_G(x_i) is a subgroup of G, Lagrange’s Theorem forces |C_G(x_i)|=p^2. Thus [G:C_G(x_i)]=p^3/p^2=p.

By the Class Equation, we thus have p^3=p+(n-p)p, which leads us to \boxed{n=p^2+p-1}.

Group of order 56 is not simple + Affordable Air Purifier

Haze strikes Singapore again, this time it is quite serious as the PSI is often above 300. For those seeking an affordable air purifier, do consider this air purifier which is one of the few that costs below $100. It is definitely reusable next year as the haze problem is not going to be solved in the near future.

[S$89.90][Clean Air]2015 Air Purifier Singapore brand and 1 year warranty with HEPA Activated Carbon UV-C germicidal killer lamp silent operation and high efficiency etc

WWW.QOO10.SG

Let G be a group of order 56. Show that G is not simple.

Proof:

We will use Sylow’s Theorem to show that either the 2-Sylow subgroup or 7-Sylow subgroup is normal.

|G|=2^3\cdot 7

By Sylow’s Theorem n_2\mid 7, n_2\equiv 1\pmod 2. Thus n_2=1,7.

Also, n_7\mid 8, n_7\equiv 1\pmod 7. Therefore n_7=1, 8.

If n_2=1 or n_7=1, we are done, as one of the Sylow subgroups is normal.

Suppose to the contrary n_2=7 and n_7=8.

Number of elements of order 7 = 8 x (7-1)=48

Remaining elements = 56-48=8. This is just enough for one 2-Sylow subgroup, thus n_2=1. This is a contradiction.

Therefore, a group of order 56 is simple.


Intersection of Center of p-group and nontrivial normal subgroup is nontrivial

Let G be a p-group and H a nontrivial normal subgroup. Prove that H\cap Z(G) is nontrivial.

Let G act on H by conjugation. Since H is a normal subgroup, this is a well-defined group action since ghg^{-1}\in H for all g\in G.

Let H_0=\{h\in H:ghg^{-1}=h\ \ \ \forall g\in G\}.

h\in H_0 \iff O(h)=\{h\}.

Therefore we have H=H_0+O(h_1)+O(h_2)+\dots+O(h_n) where |O(h_i)|>1.

By the Orbit-Stabilizer Theorem,

|H|=|H_0|+\sum_{i=1}^k |O(h_i)|=|H_0|+\sum_{i=1}^k[G:G_{h_i}]

Let |G|=p^n. By Lagrange’s Theorem, p^n=|G|=[G:G_{h_i}]|G_{h_i}|. Since |G_{h_i}|\neq p^n, therefore p\mid [G:G_{h_i}].

Hence, |H|\equiv |H_0|\pmod p.

Note that

\begin{aligned}    h\in H_0\subseteq H &\iff ghg^{-1}=h\ \ \ \forall g\in G\\    &\iff gh=hg\ \ \ \forall g\in G\\    &\iff h\in Z(G)\cap H    \end{aligned}

Therefore |H\cap Z(G)|\equiv |H|\equiv 0\pmod p. Since 1\in H\cap Z(G), this implies that p \mid |H\cap Z(G)| \neq 0. Therefore |H\cap Z(G)|\geq p.

Do check out some of our recommended Singapore Math books here!

Universal Property of Kernel Question

Recently, the Dayan Zhanchi brand Rubik’s Cube has been a hot sale on my site. Parents looking to buy an educational toy may want to check it out. Smoothness when turning is very important for Rubik’s Cube, and the Dayan Zhanchi is one of the smoothest cubes out there (much better than the ‘official’ brand).


In this blog post, we will discuss a category theory question, in the framework of homomorphisms of abelian groups.

Let \phi:M'\to M be a homomorphism of abelian groups. Suppose that \alpha:L\to M' is a homomorphism of abelian groups such that \phi\circ\alpha is the zero map. (One example is the inclusion \mu:\ker\phi\to M')

Are the following true or false?

(i) There is a unique homomorphism \alpha_0:\ker\phi\to L such that \mu=\alpha\circ\alpha_0.

(ii) There is a unique homomorphism \alpha_1:L\to\ker\phi such that \alpha=\mu\circ\alpha_1.

It turns out that (i) is false. We may construct a trivial counterexample as follows. Consider L=M=0, and M'=\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}. Let \alpha, \phi be both the zero maps. Then certainly \phi\circ\alpha=0. \ker\phi=\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}. Then, for any \alpha_0, \alpha\circ\alpha_0(x)=0, and hence is not equals to the the inclusion map \mu.

It turns out that (ii) is true, in fact it is the famous universal property of the kernel, that any homomorphism yielding zero when composed with \phi has to factor through \ker\phi.

First we will prove uniqueness. Let \alpha=\mu\circ\alpha_1=\mu\circ\beta, where \beta is another such map with the property (ii). Then for all x\in L, \mu\alpha_1(x)=\mu\beta(x), which implies \mu(\alpha_1(x)-\beta(x))=0. Since \mu is the inclusion map, this means that \alpha_1(x)-\beta(x)=0 and thus \alpha_1(x)=\beta (x).

Next, we will prove existence. Consider \alpha_1:L\to\ker\phi, \alpha_1(l)=\alpha(l). Note that \phi(\alpha(l))=0 by definition thus \alpha(l)\in\ker\phi.

Next we prove it is a homomorphism. \alpha_1(l_1l_2)=\alpha(l_1l_2)=\alpha(l_1)\alpha(l_2)=\alpha_1(l_1)\alpha_1(l_2).

Finally by construction it is easy to see that \mu\alpha_1(l)=\mu\alpha(l)=\alpha(l) for all l\in L.

 

Group of order 432 is not simple

Recently, a viewer of my blog found that my recommended books for gifted children was helpful. You may want to check those books out too.

Quote (from comment found on home page): Thanks a lot for the blog. I have a P1 girl whose hobby is to do assessment books but doesn’t like reading story books. She has completed P2 assessment books and doing P3 assessment books. With advises from her school principal, I decided not to let her progress with assessment books and I am really lost as to what to do with her. I shall try out the books that you recommended.

For this blog post, we shall show that a group of order 432=2^4\cdot 3^3 is not simple. We will be using several previous posts as lemmas to prove this nontrivial result.

Suppose to the contrary G is simple. By Sylow’s Third Theorem, n_3\equiv 1\pmod 3, n_3\mid 16. This means that n_3 is 1, 4 or 16.

We recall that if n_3=1, then the Sylow 3-subgroup is normal.

Let Q_1 and Q_2 be two distinct Sylow 3-subgroups of G such that |Q_1\cap Q_2| is maximum.

Using our previous lemma regarding index of intersection of Sylow subgroups, we split our analysis into three cases, the hardest of which is Case 3.

Case 1) If |Q_1\cap Q_2|=1, [Q_1:Q_1\cap Q_2]=3^3. Thus n_3=1\pmod {27}, which allows us to conclude n_3=1.

Case 2) If |Q_1\cap Q_2|=3, [Q_1:Q_1\cap Q_2]=3^2. Thus n_3=1 \pmod 9. Similarly, we can conclude n_3=1 and we are done.

Case 3) If |Q_1\cap Q_2|=9, then [Q_1:Q_1\cap Q_2]=3.

By another previous lemma regarding index of least prime divisor, Q_1\cap Q_2\trianglelefteq Q_1. Thus, Q_1\leq N_G(Q_1\cap Q_2). Thus |N_G(Q_1\cap Q_2)|=3^3\cdot 2, 3^3\cdot 2^2, 3^3\cdot 2^3,\text{or }3^3\cdot 2^4.

If N_G(Q_1\cap Q_2)=G, then Q_1\cap Q_2\trianglelefteq G which is a contradiction. Hence we suppose N_G(Q_1\cap Q_2)\neq G. Let [G:N_G(Q_1\cap Q_2)]=k. The possible values of k are k=2, 2^2, 2^3, 2^4.

Next, we use the fact that if G is a simple group and H is a subgroup of index k, then |G| divides k!.

Thus, 432\mid k!, which forces k=16.

But then Q_1=N_G(Q_1\cap Q_2) and similarly Q_2=N_G(Q_1\cap Q_2). Thus Q_1=Q_2. This is a contradiction to |Q_1\cap Q_2|=9.

Therefore all cases lead to contradiction and thus G is not simple.

First-Class Function is Homomorphism

tomcircle's avatarMath Online Tom Circle

We know a Program is a math procedure. 

“A Program without Math is like Sex without Love.”

Do you know in Programming a First-Class Function is a Homomorphism in Abstract Algebra ?

In Functional / Dynamic Programming Language like Lisp, it supports First-Class Function.

Eg.
Map (sqr {1 2 5 4 7})
=> {1 4 25 16 49} 

A First-Class Function like ‘Map’ is a Function call which  accepts  another function ‘sqr’ as argument.

Map means “Apply to All”.
Map applies ‘sqr’ to all members of the list  {1 2 5 4 7}.

In abstract algebra, Map (eg. Linear Map) is a homomorphism !

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Map_(higher-order_function)

View original post

Sylow subgroup intersection of a certain index + F1 Trespasser

Today, I read the news online, the latest news is that a man was strolling along the F1 track while the race was ongoing. Really unbelievable.

Also, recently our recommended books from Amazon for GAT/DSA preparation have been very popular with parents seeking preparation. Do check it out if your child is going for DSA soon.

Back to our topic on Sylow theory…

Let G be a finite group, where q is a prime divisor of G. Suppose that whenever Q_1 and Q_2 are two distinct Sylow q-subgroups of G, Q_1\cap Q_2 is a subgroup of Q_1 of index at least q^a. Prove that the number n_q of Sylow q-subgroups of G satisfies n_q\equiv 1\pmod {q^a}.

Proof: Let \Omega=\{Q_1,Q_2\dots,Q_n\} be the set of all Sylow q-subgroups of G. Fix P=Q_k\in \Omega. Consider the group action of P acting on \Omega by conjugation.

\phi:P\times\Omega\to\Omega, \phi_x(Q_i)=xQ_i x^{-1}

By Orbit-Stabilizer Theorem, |O(Q_i)|=|P|/|N_p(Q_i)|.

We claim that N_p(Q_i)=Q_i\cap P, since any element x outside of Q_i cannot normalise Q_i, since otherwise if x \neq Q_i, xQx^{-1}=Q_i, then \langle Q_i, x\rangle will be a larger q-subgroup of G than Q_i.

Thus, |O(Q_i)|=|P|/|Q_i\cap P|\geq q^a, i.e. q^a\mid |O(Q_i)|.

|O(P)|=1.

The orbits form a partition of \Omega, thus |\Omega|=1+\sum{|O(Q_i)|}, where the sum runs over all orbits other than O(P).

Thus, n_q\equiv 1\pmod {q^a}.

 

How to type LaTeX in WordPress without using “$latex”

Currently, LaTeX is well supported in WordPress, however there is one practical issue when typing LaTeX in WordPress, the need to type “$latex” for every single math expression! It gets pretty troublesome after a while.

For those familiar with LaTeX, one would know that for ordinary LaTeX typesetting, typing double $ will do, there is no need to type the word LaTeX. If I remember correctly, for Blogger there is no need to type “$latex”, hence it is a uniquely WordPress issue.

So far, I have not found any solution to this issue. (I am using WordPress.com hosted WordPress). Any readers who happen to know a solution, please enlighten me by dropping a comment! It will be greatly appreciated.

WordPress vs Blogger LaTeX:

https://mathtuition88.com/2014/12/25/math-formula-in-wordpress-vs-blogspot/


LaTeX Beginner’s Guide

Weierstrass M Test and Lebesgue’s Dominated Convergence Theorem

Previously, we wrote a blog post about Weierstrass M Test. It turns out Weierstrass M Test is a special case of Lebesgue’s Dominated Convergence Theorem, a very powerful theorem in Measure Theory, where the measure is taken to be the counting measure.

Lebesgue Dominated Convergence Theorem: Let (f_n) be a sequence of integrable functions which converges a.e. to a real-valued measurable function f. Suppose that there exists an integrable function g such that |f_n|\leq g for all n. Then, f is integrable and \displaystyle \int f d\mu=\lim_n \int f_n d\mu.

Thanks to one of our readers who purchased Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens for Canon SLR Cameras through our website! Photography fans may want to check it out.

Singapore Haze & Subgroup of Smallest Prime Index

Recently, the Singapore Haze is getting quite bad, crossing the 200 PSI Mark on several occasions. Do consider purchasing a Air Purifier, or some N95 Masks, as the haze problem is probably staying for at least a month. Personally, I use Nasal Irrigation (Neilmed Sinus Rinse), which has tremendously helped my nose during this haze period. It can help clear out dust and mucus trapped in the nose.

[S$89.90][Clean Air]2015 Air Purifier Singapore brand and 1 year warranty with HEPA Activated Carbon UV-C germicidal killer lamp silent operation and high efficiency etc

WWW.QOO10.SG

[S$19.90]Haze Prevention~ Nasal Rinse™- Flush out mucous~germs~bacteria~and dirt internally. Clear blocked nose and very soothing.

WWW.QOO10.SG

Previously, we proved that any subgroup of index 2 is normal. It turns out that there is a generalisation of this theorem. Let p be the smallest prime divisor of a group G. Then, any subgroup H\leq G of index p is normal in G.

Proof: Let H be a subgroup of G of index p. Let G act on the left cosets of H by left multiplication: \forall x\in G, x\cdot gH=xgH.

This group action induces a group homomorphism \phi:G\to S_p.

Let K=\ker \phi. If x\in K, then xgH=gH for all g\in G. In particular when g=1, xH=H, i.e. x\in H.

Thus K\subseteq H. In particular, K\trianglelefteq H, since \ker\phi is a normal subgroup of G.

We have G/K\cong \phi(G)\leq S_p. Thus |G/K|\mid p!.

Also note that |G|=|G/K||K|. Note that |G/K|\neq 1 since |G/K|=[G:H][H:K]=p[H:K]\geq p.

Let q be a prime divisor of |G/K|. Then q\leq p since |G/K|\mid p!. Also, q\mid |G|. Since p is the smallest prime divisor of |G|, p\leq q. Therefore, p=q, i.e. |G/K|=p.

Then p=p[H:K] \implies [H:K]=1, i.e. H=K. Thus, H is normal in G.

Proof of Wilson’s Theorem using Sylow’s Theorem

Wilson’s theorem (p-1)!\equiv -1 \pmod p is a useful theorem in Number Theory, and may be proved in several different ways. One of the interesting proofs is to prove it using Sylow’s Third Theorem.

Let G=S_p, the symmetric group on p elements, where p is a prime.

|G|=p!=p(p-1)!

By Sylow’s Third Theorem, we have n_p\equiv 1\pmod p. The Sylow p-subgroups of S_p have p-1 p-cycles each.

There are a total of (p-1)! different p-cycles (cyclic permutations of p elements).

Thus, we have n_p (p-1)=(p-1)!, which implies that n_p=(p-2)!

Thus (p-2)!\equiv 1\pmod p, and multiplying by p-1 gives us (p-1)!\equiv p-1\equiv -1\pmod p which is precisely Wilson’s Theorem. 🙂

If you are interested in reading some Math textbooks, do check out our recommended list of Math texts for undergraduates.

You may also want to check out Match Wits With Mensa: The Complete Quiz Book, which is our most popular recommended book on this website.

Tips to write the start of composition (argumentative essay) 议论文的开头如何入手(一)

chinesetuition88's avatarChinese Tuition Singapore

写议论文有个“万能公式”,我们称为“三段论”。就是把文章分为三个部分:开头(提出论点),中间(将论点分为几个部分加以概括并运用论据进行阐述),结尾(总结,进一步深化论点)。

都说“良好的开头是成功的一半”,所以一篇作文写出一个好的开头是十分有必要的。

有学生很苦恼,不知道该怎么写议论文的开头。如果套用“三段论”,他们往往在开头用一句话就结束了。其实议论文的开头有很多种写法。

我们以“怎样才算是一个幸福的家庭”这个题目来探讨议论文开头的写法。

这个题目的意思就是让学生阐述构成幸福家庭的条件。有一个学生认为,幸福家庭的必备条件是“父母爱护孩子,孩子孝顺父母,兄弟姐妹之间互相关心”。那我们就利用这个观点来写。

本文先介绍比较常用的几种开头方式:

1. 开门见山式。come straight to the point

这种方式的特点是在开头就将文章的论点摆出开,直截了当,一看便知文章的主旨。

例:人从一出生开始首先面对的“小社会”便是家庭。家庭的幸福与否关系到一个人的幸福与否。当然,一个幸福的家庭是需要每个家庭成员来共同努力维护的。父母爱护孩子,孩子孝顺父母,兄弟姐妹之间互相关心,这样才算是一个幸福的家庭。
2. 设问句式。(rhetorical question)

就议论的问题提出疑问,在回答问题的过程中提出自己的观点。

例:家庭与每个人的成长和生活是密不可分的。家庭环境甚至可以影响一个人的人生。人人都希望生活在幸福的家庭中,那么什么样的家庭才算是幸福的呢?幸福的家庭是需要家庭成员之间互相关怀照顾的。父母爱护孩子,孩子孝顺父母,兄弟姐妹之间互相关心,这样的家庭才会幸福。

View original post

Zmn/Zm isomorphic to Zn

The following is a simple proof of why \mathbb{Z}_{mn}/\mathbb{Z}_m\cong\mathbb{Z}_n.

For instance \mathbb{Z}_6/\mathbb{Z}_2\cong\mathbb{Z}_3. Note that the tricky part is that \mathbb{Z}_2 is not actually the usual {0,1}, but rather {0,3} (considered as part of \mathbb{Z}_6). Hence the elements of \mathbb{Z}_6/\mathbb{Z}_2 are {0,3}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, which can be seen to be isomorphic to \mathbb{Z}_3.

A sketch of a proof is as follows. Consider \phi:\mathbb{Z}_{mn}/\mathbb{Z}_m\to \mathbb{Z}_n, where \mathbb{Z}_m=\{0,n,2n,\dots,(m-1)n\}, defined by \phi (a+\mathbb{Z}_m)=a.

We may check that it is well-defined since if a+\mathbb{Z}_m=a'+\mathbb{Z}_m, then a\equiv a' \pmod n, and thus \phi (a+\mathbb{Z}_m)=\phi (a'+\mathbb{Z}_m).

It is a fairly straightforward to check it is a homomorphism, \begin{aligned}\phi (a+\mathbb{Z}_m+a'+\mathbb{Z}_m)&=\phi (a+a'+\mathbb{Z}_m)\\    &=a+a'\\    &=\phi (a+\mathbb{Z}_m)+\phi(a'+\mathbb{Z}_m)    \end{aligned}

Injectivity is clear since \ker \phi=0+\mathbb{Z}_m, and surjectivity is quite clear too.

Hence, this ends the proof. 🙂

Do check out some Recommended Books on Undergraduate Mathematics, and also download the free SG50 Scientific Pioneers Ebook, if you haven’t already.

Free Ebook: Singapore’s Scientific Pioneers

Source: http://www.asianscientist.com/pioneers/

The non-commercial book Singapore’s Scientific Pioneers, sponsored by grants from the SG50 Celebration Fund and Nanyang Technological University, is dedicated to all scientists in Singapore, past, present and, most of all, aspiring. Read more from Asian Scientist Magazine at: http://www.asianscientist.com/pioneers/

The free downloadable book also includes a Mathematician from National University of Singapore, Professor Louis Chen, one of the discoverers of the Chen-Stein method.

To download the ebook, click here to download (official mirror).

The Chen-Stein method is part of the branch of Mathematics known as Probability. Advanced probability requires a lot of Measure Theory, another type of Math classified under Analysis.

In the book, Professor Chen mentioned one of his favourite books is “One Two Three . . . Infinity: Facts and Speculations of Science (Dover Books on Mathematics)“.

It turns out that this book is very inspiring, and many reviewers on Amazon said that after they read this book during their childhood, they became inspired to become mathematicians/scientists!

Sample review (from Amazon): “It seems that almost all the reviewers had the same experience: we read this book at an early age, and it was so fascinating, so inspiring, and so magical that it directed us into math and science for the rest of our lives. In my case the book was loaned to me when I was about 12, by my best friend’s father.”

Hence, if you are looking for a Math/Science book for your child, this book may be one of the top choices. 🙂

Geometric n-simplex is convex

Given the definition of a geometric n-simplex:

\displaystyle\sigma^n=\{x=\sum_{i=0}^{n}t_i a^i \mid t_i\geq 0\ \text{and }\sum_{i=0}^{n}=1\}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n

where \{a^0,\dots, a^n\} are geometrically independent, we can show that the n-simplex is convex (i.e. given any two points, the line connecting them lies in the simplex).

Write x=\sum_{i=0}^n t_i a^i, y=\sum_{i=0}^n s_i a^i.

Consider the line from x to y: \{ty+(1-t)x\mid 0\leq t\leq 1\}.

\begin{aligned}    ty+(1-t)x&=t\sum_{i=0}^n s_i a^i+(1-t)\sum_{i=0}^n t_i a^i\\    &=\sum_{i=0}^n (s_i t+t_i-tt_i)a_i\\    s_it+t_i-tt_i&=s_i t+t_i (1-t)\\    &\geq 0(0)+(0)(1-1)\\    &=0\\    \sum_{i=0}^n s_i t+t_i-tt_i &=t\sum_{i=0}^n s_i+\sum_{i=0}^n t_i -t\sum_{i=0}^n t_i\\    &=t(1)+(1)-t(1)\\    &=1    \end{aligned}

Thus the line lies inside the simplex, and thus the simplex is convex.


Recommended Books for Math Majors

 

Life Algebra

tomcircle's avatarMath Online Tom Circle

image

How to solve this ‘Life’ Algebra ?

The simultatneous inequality equation with 3 unknowns (t, e, m).

It has no solution but we can get the BEST approximation :
Retire after 55 before 60, then you get optimized {e, t, m} — still have good energy (e) with plenty of time (t) and sufficient pension money (m) in CPF & investment saving.

Beyond 60 if continuing to work, the solution of {e, t, m} -> {0, 0, 0}.

View original post

Tiger Mom Amy Chua Sets Up Tuition Center in Singapore

Source: http://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/20/queen-of-the-tiger-moms-takes-on-singapore.html

“Tiger Mom” Amy Chua has started a Tuition Center in Singapore. Amy Chua is the famous author of Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, which is an interesting book which has both supporters and critics.

The Tuition Centre is called Keys Academy, located in North Bridge Road, Singapore.

Do check it out, and more importantly do read the book Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother to see if you agree with the author! Amy Chua does have some good points to be made, as many of the top students in Western countries are Asians. Do check out her book to read about her method.


Some other books written by Amy Chua are:

The Triple Package: How Three Unlikely Traits Explain the Rise and Fall of Cultural Groups in America

Day of Empire: How Hyperpowers Rise to Global Dominance–and Why They Fall

World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability

Cycle Decomposition of Permutations is Unique

Cycle decomposition of Permutations into disjoint cycles is unique (up to reordering of cycles).

A proof can be found here.

The condition of disjoint is crucial. For example, the permutation (1 3 2) can be factored into (2 3)(1 2), where the two cycles are not disjoint. (1 3 2)=(1 2)(1 3) is also another decomposition, the two cycles are also not disjoint.

Wolframalpha can calculate permutations, a useful tool to replace manual calculations. Take note though that Wolframalpha’s convention is multiplying permutations from left to right, while most books follow the convention of multiplying right to left.


Recommended Math Books from Amazon

“偷得浮生半日闲”诗句分析—出现于中三课文《乌敏岛》

chinesetuition88's avatarChinese Tuition Singapore

在中三下华文课本中,有一篇题目为《乌敏岛》的课文。课文介绍了乌敏岛的自然风光和纯朴的人文环境。在文章的最后,作者写道“如果能’偷得浮生半日闲’,何不暂时摆脱现实的束缚,和三五好友到乌敏岛游玩呢?”。

“偷得浮生半日闲”出自于唐代诗人李涉的七言绝句《题鹤林寺僧舍》。全文如下:

终日昏昏醉梦间,忽闻春尽强登山。

因过竹院逢僧话,偷得浮生半日闲。

大意是:作者整日昏昏沉沉处于醉梦之中,消磨人生。忽然有一天才意识到春天就要过去了,于是勉强去爬山。在游览寺院的时候碰到一位高僧,便与其闲聊,难得在这纷纷扰扰的世事中获得片刻的清闲。

这首诗的创作背景是李涉官途不顺,被皇帝贬官后又流放到南方,所以其情绪消极终日昏昏沉沉。而在一次偶然机会,登山之时偶遇高僧,闲聊之中,不料解开了苦闷的心结,化解了世俗的烦扰,使得自己心情得以放松。

再回到课文《乌敏岛》,从课文的开始,作者就强调“踏上乌敏岛,映入眼帘的是一幅和繁忙市区截然不同的景象”。市区的人们熙熙攘攘,为生活而忙于奔走,有很多世事的烦扰。而乌敏岛却是一个别样的世界,这里没有喧嚣,人们的生活简单平静而又质朴。来到这里,看看美不胜收的风景,体验淳朴宁静的生活,相信你也会暂时忘记现实生活的烦恼和忧愁。

“偷得浮生半日闲”,人生漂浮不定,难得半日的清闲。

View original post

Weierstrass M-test Proof and Special Case of Abel’s Theorem

First, let us recap what is Weierstrass M-test:

Weierstrass M-test:

Let \{f_n\} be a sequence of real (or complex)-valued functions defined on a set A, and let \{M_n\} be a sequence satisfying \forall n\in\mathbb{N}, \forall x\in A

|f_n (x)|\leq M_n, and also \sum_{n=1}^\infty M_n=M<\infty.

Then, \sum_{n=1}^\infty f_n(x) converges uniformly on A (to a function f).

Proof:

Let \epsilon >0. \exists N\in\mathbb{N} such that m\geq N implies |M-\sum_{n=1}^m M_n|<\epsilon.

For m\geq N, \forall x\in A,

\begin{aligned}    |f(x)-\sum_{n=1}^m f_n(x)|&=|\sum_{n=m+1}^\infty f_n (x)|\\    &\leq\sum_{n=m+1}^\infty |f_n (x)|\\    &\leq \sum_{n=m+1}^\infty M_n\\    &=|M-\sum_{n=1}^m M_n|\\    &<\epsilon    \end{aligned}

Thus, \sum_{n=1}^\infty f_n (x) converges uniformly.

Application to prove Abel’s Theorem (Special Case):

Consider the special case of Abel’s Theorem where all the coefficients a_i are of the same sign (e.g. all positive or all negative).

Then, for x\in [0,1],

|a_n x^n|\leq |a_n|:=M_n

Then by Weierstrass M-test, \sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n x^n converges uniformly on [0,1] and thus \lim_{x\to 1^-} \sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n x^n=\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n.


Check out some books suitable for Math Majors here!

 

If Ratio Test Limit exists, then Root Test Limit exists, and both are equal

The limit for ratio test is \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{|a_{n+1}|}{|a_n|}, while the limit for root test is \lim_{n\to\infty}|a_n|^{1/n}. Something special about these two limits is that if the former exists, the latter also exists and they are equal!

Proof:

Let \lim_{n\to\infty}|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}|=L. There exists N\in\mathbb{N} such that n\geq N \implies ||\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}|-L|<\epsilon.

i.e. L-\epsilon<|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}|<L+\epsilon

For n>N,

|a_n|=\frac{|a_n|}{|a_{n-1}|}\cdot \frac{|a_{n-1}|}{|a_{n-2}|}\cdots \frac{|a_{N+1}|}{|a_N|}\cdot |a_N| < (L+\epsilon)^{n-N}\cdot |a_N|.

Taking nth roots,

|a_n|^{1/n}<(L+\epsilon)^\frac{n-N}{n}\cdot |a_N|^{\frac{1}{n}}

Taking limits,

\lim_{n\to\infty}|a_n|^{\frac{1}{n}}\leq (L+\epsilon)

Since \epsilon is arbitrary, \lim_{n\to\infty}|a_n|^{\frac{1}{n}}\leq L.

Similarly, we can show \lim_{n\to\infty}|a_n|^\frac{1}{n}\geq L.

Thus, \lim_{n\to\infty}|a_n|^\frac{1}{n}=L.

This is considered a rather tricky (though not that difficult) proof, hope it helps whoever is searching for it!

Note that the converse is false, we can see that by considering the “rearranged” geometric series: 1/2,1, 1/8, 1/4, 1/32, … (source: https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/0025570×33450.di021200.02p0190s.pdf)

where the ratio alternates from 2 to 1/8 and hence does not exist.

However, the root test limit of the first 2n terms is defined:

\begin{aligned}    |a_{2n}|&=\frac{|a_{2n}|}{a_{2n-1}}\cdot \frac{|a_{2n-1}|}{|a_{2n-2}|}\cdot \frac{|a_2|}{|a_1|}\cdot |a_1|\\    &=2\cdot \frac{1}{8}\cdot 2 \cdot \frac{1}{8} \cdots 2 \cdot \frac{1}{2}\\    &=2^n \cdot (\frac{1}{8})^{n-1}\cdot \frac{1}{2}\\    &=(\frac{1}{4})^{n-1}    \end{aligned}

Thus, |a_{2n}|^\frac{1}{2n}=\frac{1}{4}^{\frac{n-1}{2n}}\to \frac{1}{2}.


To learn more about epsilon-delta proofs, check out one of the Recommended Analysis Books for Undergraduates.

 

Z[Sqrt(-2)] is a Principal Ideal Domain Proof

It turns out that to prove \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-2}] is a Principal Ideal Domain, it is easier to prove that it is a Euclidean domain, and hence a PID.

(Any readers who have a direct proof that \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-2}] is a PID, please comment below, as it would be very interesting to know such a proof. 🙂 )

Proof:

As mentioned above, we will prove that it is a Euclidean domain.

Let a, b\in\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-2}], b\neq 0.

We need to show: \exists q, r\in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-2}] such that a=bq+r, with N(r)<N(b).

Consider \frac{a}{b}=c_1+c_2 \sqrt{-2} \in \mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{-2}]. Define q=q_1+q_2 \sqrt{-2} where q_1, q_2 are the integers closest to c_1, c_2 respectively.

Then, \frac{a}{b}=q+\alpha, where \alpha=\alpha_1+\alpha_2 \sqrt{-2}.

a=bq+b\alpha.

Take r=b\alpha.

\begin{aligned}    N(r)&=N(b\alpha)\\    &=N(b)\cdot N(\alpha)\\    &=N(b)\cdot (\alpha_1^2+2\alpha_2^2)\\    &\leq N(b)\cdot ({\frac{1}{2}}^2+2(\frac{1}{2})^2)\\    &=N(b)\cdot (\frac{3}{4})\\    &<N(b)    \end{aligned}


Check out recommended Abstract Algebra books: Recommended Books for Math Undergraduates

 

Is Z[x] a Principal Ideal Domain?

In the previous post, we showed that a Euclidean domain is a Principal Ideal Domain (PID).

Consider the Polynomial Ring \mathbb{Z}[x]. We can show that it is not a PID and hence also not a Euclidean domain.

Proof: Consider the ideal <2,x>=\{ 2f(x)+xg(x)\vert f(x), g(x) \in \mathbb{Z} [x]\}.

Suppose to the contrary <2,x>=<p(x)>=\{ f(x)p(x)\vert f(x)\in \mathbb{Z}[x]\}.

Note that 2\in <2,x>, hence 2\in <p(x)>.

2=f(x)p(x)

p(x)=2 or -2.

<p(x)>=<2>

However, x\in <2,x> but x\notin <2>. (contradiction!)


Check out this page for Recommended Singapore Math books!

 

Proof that a Euclidean Domain is a PID (Principal Ideal Domain)

Previously, we defined what is a Euclidean Domain and what is a PID. Now, we will prove that in fact a Euclidean Domain is always a PID (Principal Ideal Domain). This proof will be elaborated, it can be shortened if necessary.

Proof:

Let R be a Euclidean domain.

Let I be a nonzero ideal of R. (If I is a zero ideal, then I=(0) )

Choose b\in I, b\neq 0 such that d(b)=\min \{ d(i): i\in I\}, where d is the Euclidean function. By the well-ordering principle, every non-empty set of positive integers contains a least element, hence b exists.

Let a\in I be any element in I. \exists q,r \in R such that a=bq+r, with either r=0, or d(r)<d(b). (This is the property of Euclidean domain.)

We can’t have d(r)<d(b) as that will contradict minimality of d(b). Thus, r=0, and a=bq. Hence every element in the ideal is a multiple of b, i.e. I=(b). Thus R is a PID (Principal Ideal Domain).


Check out other pages on our blog:

 

Definition of Euclidean Domain and Principal Ideal Domain (PID)

A Euclidean domain is an integral domain R with a function d:R\setminus \{0\}\to \mathbb{N} satisfying the following:

(1) d(a)\leq d(ab) for all nonzero a,b in R.

(2) for all a,b \in R, b\neq 0, \exists q, r, \in R such that a=bq+r, with either r=0 or d(r)<d(b).

(d is known as the Euclidean function)

On the other hand, a Principal ideal domain (PID) is an integral domain in which every ideal is principal (can be generated by a single element).


Recommended Math Books for University students

 

Proof that any subgroup of index 2 is normal

Let H\leq G be a subgroup of index 2.

Let g\in G and h\in H.

If g\in H, then gH=H, and Hg=H, hence left coset equals to right coset.

If g\notin H, then gH=G\setminus H (set minus), and also Hg=G\setminus H, thus left coset also equals to right coset.

Tip: For this question, using the equivalent definition of ghg^{-1}\in H to prove will be quite tricky and convoluted, as seen here.

Recommended Page: Check out the following Recommended Math Books for Undergrads!

Aut(Z_n): Automorphism Group of Z_n

Do check out our list of Recommended Undergraduate Math Books!

We prove that Aut(\mathbb{Z}_n)\cong (\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})^*, also known as U(n) (easier to type).

Define \Psi: Aut(\mathbb{Z}_n)\to U(n) by \Psi(\phi)=\phi (1).

First we show that it is a homomorphism:

\begin{aligned}\Psi(\phi_1 \circ \phi_2)&=\phi_1(\phi_2(1))\\    &=\phi_1 (1+1+\cdots +1)\ \ \ (\phi_2 (1) \text{ times})\\    &=\phi_1 (1)+\phi_1 (1)+\cdots +\phi_1 (1)\ \ \ (\phi_2 (1) \text{ times})\\    &=\phi_2 (1) \cdot \phi_1 (1)\\    &=\Psi (\phi_2)\cdot \Psi (\phi_1)\\    &=\Psi (\phi_1) \cdot \Psi (\phi_2)\ \ \ \text{since} (\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})^* \text{ is abelian.}    \end{aligned}

Next we show that it is injective:

\Psi (\phi) =1

Thus, \phi (1)=1.

Let x\in \mathbb{Z}_n.

\phi (x)=x\phi (1)=x\cdot 1=x.

Thus, the only automorphism that maps to 1 is the identity.

Thus, \ker \Psi is trivial.

Finally, we show that it is surjective.

Let x\in (\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})^*. Consider \phi such that \phi (0)=0, \phi (1)=x, \phi (i)=ix, …, \phi (n-1)=(n-1)x.

We claim that \phi is an automorphism of \mathbb{Z}_n.

Firstly, we need to show that \{0,1,2,\cdots, n-1\}=x\{0, 1, 2, \cdots, n-1\}. This is because \gcd (x,n)=1. Hence if q is the order of x, i.e. qx\equiv 0 \pmod n, then n\vert qx, which implies that n\vert q which implies that q is at least n. Since the order of x is also at most n, q=n.

Finally, we have \phi(a+b)=(a+b)x=ax+bx=\phi (a)+\phi (b) and thus we may take \phi as the preimage of x.

Hence \Psi is surjective.

This is a detailed explanation of the proof, it can be made more concise to fit in a few paragraphs!

Related posts: Recommended Books for Math Students

Egg Mathematics

tomcircle's avatarMath Online Tom Circle

I highly recommend this Harvard Online Course “Science & Cooking” for food and Math lover:

http://online-learning.harvard.edu/course/science-and-cooking

Example of the Course :

How much boiled water you need to cook a perfect egg ?

By conservation of heat (energy), the heat (Q) of boiled water is transferred to the egg (assume no loss of heat to the environment: container, air, etc).

Secondary school Physics :

Q = m.C. (T’-T)
m = mass
C=Specific Heat
T’= Final Température
T= Initial Temperature

image

Chef’s tip: a perfect egg cooked at around 64 C.

image

View original post

Chinese Tuition (West Side of Singapore)

If you live near the West side of Singapore (e.g. Buona Vista, Dover, Clementi, Jurong), and are looking for a patient and dedicated Chinese Tutor, do check out:

ChineseTuition88.com

Chinese Tuition Singapore

新加坡华文补习老师

Tutor: Ms Gao (高老师)

Ms Gao is a patient tutor, and also effectively bilingual in both Chinese and English.

A native speaker of Mandarin, she speaks clearly with perfect accent and pronunciation. She is also well-versed in Chinese history, idioms and proverbs.

Ms Gao is able to teach Chinese at the Primary and Secondary school level. She will teach in an exam-oriented style, but will also try her best to make the lesson interesting for the student.

Ms Gao graduated from Huaqiao University from Fujian, China.

Contact:

Email: chinesetuition88@gmail.com

(Preferably looking for students staying in the West side of Singapore)

Video on Simplices and Simplicial Complexes

Professor Wildberger is extremely kind to upload his videos which would be very useful to any Math student studying Topology. Simplices / Simplicial Complexes are usually the first chapter in a Algebraic Topology book.

Check out also Professor Wildberger’s book on Rational Trigonometry, something that is quite novel and a new approach to the subject of Trigonometry. For instance, it can be used for rational parametrisation of a circle.

#SG50 Singapore’s Birthday (National Day Song)

This year’s national day song is being sung by JJ Lin, a very famous Singaporean songwriter and artiste who has become famous in China and Taiwan.

Hope you enjoy the song and music video! JJ Lin’s vocals are indeed very good, and for him to sing the national day song is really a good thing.

From an educational perspective, one thing special about Singapore is Singapore Math. I have written a very long article on what is Singapore Math, and the benefits of Singapore Math, and also some key books that exemplify the techniques of Singapore Math.

Hope that more and more people can appreciate and utilise Singapore Math for the benefit of their students and children! Singapore Math is the key secret that has led Singapore to progress up in the educational rankings, especially in early education stages. Students and parents all over the world, including the United States, have been using Singapore Math syllabus to great success.

For readers who are interested to learn more about Singapore Math, do check out some of my earlier blog posts on Singapore Math:

SG50 Happy Birthday + Qoo10 Best Offers

Wishing Singapore a very happy SG50 birthday this weekend!

Do check out some of the SG50 sales at Qoo10, many of the items are going at half price! Definitely cheaper than buying at retail stores.

[S$599.00][LG Electronics]2015 New LG Robot Vacuum Cleaner VR6470LVM VR6471LVM Ccordless/ Dual Eye Cleaner Hombot Support English Chinese

WWW.QOO10.SG

[S$499.00][1DAY Super Big Deal!]Canon EOS 100D 1855 Lens Kit Save $500! 50% SALE!!

WWW.QOO10.SG

Also check out my previous posts on Best Deals at Qoo10!

MacBook Air for Math Students

Tired of “blue screens of death” that are so common in Windows? Don’t want to wait 10 minutes for Windows to “start up”? Switch to Mac OS!

My old computer (ASUS) has lasted me 5 years, but has recently gotten to the point that it slows down to a crawl. Booting up Windows takes up to 15 minutes, and “blue screens of death” occurs extremely frequently. It hasn’t spoiled completely yet, I still use it for printing documents.

I have since switched to MacBook Air, and so far it has been a great experience.

Tips for Math Students using MacBook Air / Pro

For Math students, some apps that you may want to install are MacTeX. It is the LaTeX Mac version. The initial download is over 2 GB, so it might take a while. I downloaded the installer from the main website, it took around one hour.

Another app is Google Chrome, which works very well on Mac. WordPress.com runs better on Chrome, for instance the LaTeX expressions are rendered better on the Chrome browser versus the Safari browser.

MacBook Air is one of the lightest notebooks around. The downside is that it does not have a few features, for example Ethernet Adapter and Optical Drive. Not to worry, one can purchase add-ons to remedy the problem. (Listed below)


Thunderbolt to Gigabit Ethernet Adapter


Aluminum External USB DVD+RW,-RW Super Drive for Apple–MacBook Air, Pro, iMac, Mini

MacBook takes some time to get used to, hence it is good to play around with it to discover the hidden shortcuts. For instance, Copy on Mac is command-C instead of control-C.

If you have any tips for using the MacBook, do feel free to share it in the comments section below!

The Fundamental Group

Source: Topology (2nd Economy Edition)

If we pick a point x_0 of the space X to serve as a “base point” and consider only those paths that begin and end at x_0, the set of these path-homotopy classes does form a group under *. It will be called the fundamental group of X.

The important thing about the fundamental group is that it is a topological invariant of the space X, and it will be crucial in studying homeomorphism problems.

Definition of fundamental group:
Let X be a space; let x_0 be a point of X. A path in X that begins and ends at x_0 is called a loop based at x_0. The set of path homotopy classes of loops based at x_0, with operation *, is defined as the fundamental group of X relative to the base point x_0. It is denoted by \pi_1 (X,x_0).

Previously, we have shown that the operation * satisfies the axioms for a group. (See our earlier blog posts on the associativity properties and other groupoid properties of the operation.

This group is called the first homotopy group of X. There is also a second homotopy group, and even groups \pi_n (X,x_0) for all n\in \mathbb{Z}^+.

An example of a fundamental group:

\pi_1 (\mathbb{R}^n,x_0) is the trivial group (the group consisting of just the identity). This is because if f is a loop in \mathbb{R}^n based at x_0, the straight line homotopy is a path homotopy between f and the constant path at x_0.

An interesting question (discussed in the next upcoming blog posts) would be how the group depends on the base point x_0.

Things to Make and Do in the Fourth Dimension: A Mathematician’s Journey through Narcissistic Numbers, Optimal Dating Algorithms, at Least Two Kinds of Infinity, and More, by Matt Parker

Check out the latest new Math book on the Fourth Dimension! The Fourth Dimension is the mysterious dimension which cannot be seen. Check out also our previous post on the Fourth Dimension Explained.


Things to Make and Do in the Fourth Dimension: A Mathematician’s Journey Through Narcissistic Numbers, Optimal Dating Algorithms, at Least Two Kinds of Infinity, and More

Mathematics popularizer Matt Parker, an Australian based in England, is a self-proclaimed “standup mathematician” perhaps best known for his numerous contributions to the Numberphile YouTube channel. He is also the Public Engagement in Mathematics Fellow at Queen Mary, University of London, and his new book, Things to Make and Do in the Fourth Dimension, is an ambitious and delightful addition to the current age’s plethora of high-quality volumes on recreational mathematics—even if most of the material he covers is focused on 2-D and 3-D. Like the extensive writings of legendaryScientific American columnist Martin Gardner this book seeks to make mathematics come alive for an intelligent and curious audience by engaging the reader in a lively informal style, and with irresistible invocations to roll up one’s sleeve and experiment. Parker also enlivens his chapters with numerous surprises.

Source: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-get-to-the-fourth-dimension/?WT.mc_id=SA_WR_20150805

GEP Test Dates 2015

Source: http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/programmes/gifted-education-programme/faq/gep-pupils/

Just a gentle reminder that the dates for 2015 GEP Test would be as follows:

Schedule for 2015

  1. GEP Screening Test: 28 Aug 2015
  2. GEP Selection Test: 20 and 21 Oct 2015
  3. Invitation to join GEP: Early November 2015

(Do check the website above for updates)

Students interested to buy books relevant to GEP can check out one of my most popular blog posts on Recommended Books for GEP Screening / Selection Test. The truth is that at age 9 there is little difference between normal and gifted kids, i.e. normal kids with some training and excellent family support / learning environment can easily be on par with gifted students. Gifted students are nothing really special, they do have more training and good family learning background, but normal students with additional exposure and training can be as good as gifted students.

Singapore’s educational experts and professors have recently called for Singapore as a nation to read more books, posted prominently in Straits Times. The correct choice of books is critical, as reading books meant for entertainment like Harry Potter or Twilight is unlikely to benefit students a great deal. Worse still is reading FaceBook or Twitter, as they are often in broken English. Singaporeans are notoriously known for reading very few books, leading to bookstores like Borders and PageOne completely shutting down in Singapore. Students who wish to enter GEP would need to read even more books, as GEP would require a broad knowledge base, which is tested in the vocabulary and logic section of the screening tests.

In my earlier post on Recommended GEP Books, I recommended some books to tackle the notoriously difficult GEP Screening Test, including the Vocabulary Section, Math Section, and Logic Section. Children with weaker English levels would definitely need to brush up on their vocabulary, as words like “gregarious“, “amicable“, “cantankerous” would pop up in GEP tests, leading to students being “flabbergasted“.

For the Math section, the harder GEP Screening Math questions are undoubtedly of a Math Olympiad style that would flounder all but those who are trained in the art of Math Olympiad. It is a truth that a P3 student scoring 100 marks in normal Math, most likely cannot solve a P3 Math Olympiad problem due to lack of training. However, once he/she is trained, Math Olympiad is just a trick and will be easily solved. Check out some Recommended Books for Math Olympiad Self-learning.

Finally, remember the Cheryl Birthday Puzzle that went viral? This is an example of a logic puzzle. Logic is not taught anywhere in the syllabus, and hence students would need to self learn to master the art of logic puzzles. This skill will be critical again for DSA / GAT / HAST, as they will be testing the similar logic puzzles again for P6 DSA.

To all students taking the GEP test, all the best. Keep calm and good luck!

Measure Theory: What does a.e. (almost everywhere) mean

Source: Elements of Integration by Professor Bartle

Students studying Mathematical Analysis, Advanced Calculus, or probability would sooner or later come across the term a.e. or “almost everywhere”.

In layman’s terms, it means that the proposition (in the given context) holds for all cases except for a certain subset which is very small. For instance, if f(x)=0 for all x, and g(x)=0 for all nonzero x, but g(0)=1, the function f and g would be equal almost everywhere.

For formally, a certain proposition holds \mu-almost everywhere if there exists a subset N\in \mathbf{X} with \mu (N)=0 such that the proposition holds on the complement of N. \mu is a measure defined on the measure space \mathbf{X}, which is discussed in a previous blog post: What is a Measure.

Two functions f, g are said to be equal \mu-almost everywhere when f(x)=g(x) when x\notin N, for some N\in X with \mu (N)=0. In this case we would often write f=g, \mu-a.e.

Similarly, this notation can be used in the case of convergence, for example f=\lim f_n, \mu-a.e.

The idea of “almost everywhere” is useful in the theory of integration, as there is a famous Theorem called “Lebesgue criterion for Riemann integrability”.

(From Wikipedia)

A function on a compact interval [ab] is Riemann integrable if and only if it is bounded and continuous almost everywhere (the set of its points of discontinuity has measure zero, in the sense of Lebesgue measure). This is known as the Lebesgue’s integrability condition or Lebesgue’s criterion for Riemann integrability or the Riemann—Lebesgue theorem.[4] The criterion has nothing to do with the Lebesgue integral. It is due to Lebesgue and uses his measure zero, but makes use of neither Lebesgue’s general measure or integral.

Reference book:

Post-Modern Algebra

Trigonometry in abstract algebra Group Theory… this is a new look of Elementary Math (E. Math) from a higher level (Abstract Algebra : Group Theory) — just as the Tang Poem said “欲穷千里目, 更上一层楼” (To see further distance away, just climb up to higher level).

tomcircle's avatarMath Online Tom Circle

Modern Algebra: Based on the 1931 influential book “Modern Algebra” written by Van de Waerden (the student of E. Noether). Pioneered by the 20th century german Göttingen school of mathematicians, it deals with Mathematics in an abstract, axiomatic approach of mathematical structures such as Group, Ring, Vector Space, Module and Linear Algebra. It differs from the computational Algebra in 19th century dealing with Matrices and Polynomial equations.

This phase of Modern Algebra emphasises on the algebraization of Number Theory: {N, Z, Q, R, C}

Post-Modern Algebra: The axiomatic, abstract treatment of Algebra is viewed as boring and difficult. There is a renewed interest in explicite computation, reviving the 19th century invariant theory. Also the structural coverage (Group, Ring, Fields, etc) in Modern Algebra is too narrow. There is emphasis on other structures beyond Number Theory, such as Ordered Set, Monoid, Quasigroup, Category, etc.

Example:
The non-abelian Group S3 (order…

View original post 30 more words

Analysis -> (Topology) -> Algebra

tomcircle's avatarMath Online Tom Circle

Mathematics is divided into 2 major branches:
1. Analysis (Continuity, alculus)
2. Algebra (Set, Discrete numbers, Structure)

In between the two branches, Poincaré invented in 1900s the Topology (拓扑学) – which studies the ‘holes’ (disconnected) in-between, or ‘neighborhood’.

Topology specialised in
–  ‘local knowledge’ = Point-Set Topology.
– ”global knowledge’ = Algebraic Topology.

Example:
The local data of consumer behavior uses ‘Point-Set Topology’; the global one is ‘BIG Data’ using Algebraic Topology.

View original post

IMO 2015 USA beat China after 20 Years

tomcircle's avatarMath Online Tom Circle

image

The result is not surprising to China but to USA:
♢Recently China government bans IMO training in schools.
♢Obama was surprised that the USA IMO team consists of predominantly Chinese American students.

IMO Math is like ‘Acrobatics’ to real ‘Kung-fu’, it is not real Math education, but special ‘cute’ techniques to solve tough ‘known’ solution problems. Real Math is long R&D solving problems with UNKNOWN solution (eg. Fermat’s Last Theorem, Riemann Conjecture,…)

2 types of Math: Algorithmic or Deductive (演绎). Chinese long traditional ‘abacus’ mindset, procedural computational Math is Algorithmic, applied to special cases (eg. astronomy, calendar, agriculture, architecture, commerce,…). European Greek’s Euclid deductive, step-by-step axiom-based proofing, is theoretical, generalized in all cases (Geometry, Abstract Algebra,…)

Look at the Fields Medal (aka ‘Nobel Prize’ of Math) super-power – France – which has produced 1/3 of the Fields Medalists, but performing so-so in IMO. In contrast, China has ZERO Fields…

View original post 53 more words