Something interesting I realised in my studies in Math is that certain theorems are more “useful” than others. Certain theorems’ sole purpose seem to be an intermediate step to prove another theorem and are never used again. Other theorems seem to be so useful and their usage is everywhere.
One of the most “useful” theorems in basic Ring theory is the following:
Let be a commutative ring with 1 and
an ideal of
. Then
(i) is prime iff
is an integral domain.
(ii) is maximal iff
is a field.
With this theorem, the following question is solved effortlessly:
Let be a commutative ring with 1 and let
and
be ideals of
such that
.
(i) Show that is a prime ideal of
iff
is a prime ideal of
.
(ii) Show that is a maximal ideal of
iff
is a maximal ideal of
.
Sketch of Proof of (i):
is a prime ideal of
iff
is an integral domain. (
by the Third Isomorphism Theorem. )
is a prime ideal of
.
(ii) is proved similarly.
https://tomcircle.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/visual-isomorphism/
LikeLike