My second grade teacher was convinced that I had a learning disability. Now I am in my third year at Yale, working on a PhD degree in mathematics (I’m into analytic number theory, if you are curious).
“Prodigy” describes neither me nor anyone that I know. I think that it is a word that is far too overused, abused, and misused. My experience tells me that (with possibly a few, singular exceptions that we don’t yet understand well enough to properly gauge) people don’t become experts in something by being innately good at it, but by putting in the 10,000 hours necessary to make the subject an inherent part of their makeup.
I have told this to students before—there is no shame in not studying higher math because you think your time would be better used elsewhere. But for the love of God, don’t quit just because you feel like you aren’t good enough.
Advertisements
Blog Stats
 1,248,851 views
Latest Updates
Singapore Maths Tuition

Singapore Maths Tuition
 Sweet & Sour Ribs （糖醋排骨）
 Singtel Dash $3 Cashback and other Promos
 Zong Zi Again!
 WordAds Appeal Successful
 Soy Sauce Chicken & Tamago Yaki Bento
 New Math applied in Modern Physics
 5G Polar Codes Dr. Erdal Arikan
 “Poisson Distribution Intuition (and derivation)”
 丘成桐：数理与人文（原创完整版）
 China Gaokao 2019 Interesting Math Question
Archives
Maths Strategy Tuition
Follow me on Twitter
My Tweets
Advertisements
Pingback: Does one have to be math prodigy in order to pursue a doctorate in Math « Mathematics Hothouse
Very convincing thoughts. 10,000 hours is the investment one needs to put before he/ she asks for the return on investment !!
LikeLiked by 1 person