My second grade teacher was convinced that I had a learning disability. Now I am in my third year at Yale, working on a PhD degree in mathematics (I’m into analytic number theory, if you are curious).
“Prodigy” describes neither me nor anyone that I know. I think that it is a word that is far too overused, abused, and misused. My experience tells me that (with possibly a few, singular exceptions that we don’t yet understand well enough to properly gauge) people don’t become experts in something by being innately good at it, but by putting in the 10,000 hours necessary to make the subject an inherent part of their makeup.
I have told this to students before—there is no shame in not studying higher math because you think your time would be better used elsewhere. But for the love of God, don’t quit just because you feel like you aren’t good enough.
Advertisements
Blog Stats
 749,785 views
Latest Updates
Singapore Maths Tuition

Singapore Maths Tuition
 Is There a Multidimensional Mathematical World Hidden in the Brain’s Computation?
 What is math?
 Yitang Zhang’s Santa Barbara Beach Walk
 Finally received WordAds payout by WordPress
 Singapore Math for Primary School Kids
 Guide to Starting Javaplex (With Matlab)
 Subtle Error in Wikipedia: Dedekind’s number
 Habitica Mage Highest Intelligence Gear Guide
 Donald Trump Math: 17×6=?
 Pi hiding in prime regularities
Archives
Maths Strategy Tuition
Follow me on Twitter
My Tweets
Pingback: Does one have to be math prodigy in order to pursue a doctorate in Math « Mathematics Hothouse
Very convincing thoughts. 10,000 hours is the investment one needs to put before he/ she asks for the return on investment !!
LikeLiked by 1 person