My second grade teacher was convinced that I had a learning disability. Now I am in my third year at Yale, working on a PhD degree in mathematics (I’m into analytic number theory, if you are curious).
“Prodigy” describes neither me nor anyone that I know. I think that it is a word that is far too overused, abused, and misused. My experience tells me that (with possibly a few, singular exceptions that we don’t yet understand well enough to properly gauge) people don’t become experts in something by being innately good at it, but by putting in the 10,000 hours necessary to make the subject an inherent part of their makeup.
I have told this to students before—there is no shame in not studying higher math because you think your time would be better used elsewhere. But for the love of God, don’t quit just because you feel like you aren’t good enough.
Advertisements
Blog Stats
 790,134 views
Latest Updates
Singapore Maths Tuition

Singapore Maths Tuition
 Son of taxi driver among this year’s President’s Scholars
 I’m a Rare Breed: An Elite Chess Player Who’s Open About His Faith
 UK Textbooks à la Chinese / Singapore Math Style
 How (not) to memorise mathematics
 Math drives Biology
 The Ring Z/nZ, Fermat Little Theorem, Chinese Theorem (French)
 The scientist nuns: In pursuit of faith and reason
 Ideal Math Education
 Theorem of the Day
 How to win Sir Roger Penrose’s Chess puzzle (that computers can’t solve)
Archives
Maths Strategy Tuition
Follow me on Twitter
My Tweets
Pingback: Does one have to be math prodigy in order to pursue a doctorate in Math « Mathematics Hothouse
Very convincing thoughts. 10,000 hours is the investment one needs to put before he/ she asks for the return on investment !!
LikeLiked by 1 person