This post proves that if is a function that is holomorphic (analytic) and injective, then
for all
in
. The condition of having nonzero derivative is equivalent to the condition of conformal (preserves angles). Hence, this result can be stated as “A holomoprhic and injective function is conformal.”
(Proof modified from Stein-Shakarchi Complex Analysis)
We prove by contradiction. Suppose to the contrary for some
. Using Taylor series,
Since ,
for all
near
, with
,
and
where
is analytic.
For sufficiently small , we write
where
.
Since on a small circle centered at
, and
has at least two zeroes inside that circle, Rouche’s theorem implies that
has at least two zeroes there.
Since the zeroes of a non-constant holomorphic function are isolated, for all
but sufficiently close to
.
Let ,
be the two roots of
. Note that since
,
,
. If
, then
for some analytic function
. This means
which is a contradiction.
Thus , which implies that
is not injective.